Which is better puppet and chef

The three configuration tools are simple to use and yet facilitate robust capabilities to automate complex multi-tier IT application environments. The availability of the three configuration tools in the event of main master or server failure is very high.

Every tool has the facility of a backup server or an alternative master to render support in case of main server failure. Configuration language plays a prominent role in determining the applications of a configuration management tool. Chef and Puppet follow master-agent or master-slave architecture. The management of the DevOps tools depends upon the language and configuration of the tools.

Pull configuration involves pulling all configurations from a central server to the slave nodes without any commands.

Whereas, in a push configuration, all the configurations in the server will be pushed to the nodes with specific commands. In terms of configuration language, YAML is considered to be the easiest one as it is similar to English and is human-readable. Once again Ansible portrays its dominance over the others in terms of management as it supports YAML language and follows both push and pull configurations.

Scalability of the configuration tools is one of the main factors considered by the enterprises before choosing the tool. Chef, Puppet and Ansible are capable of managing large infrastructures while handling the burden in scaling configurations.

On top of that, the systems are open-source, meaning that you can change their behaviors by modifying their codes. The possibilities are thus endless and are limited only by your available time and knowledge.

The tutorials are thorough and explain most topics with ease. You can start learning with a Vagrant VM, an Amazon cloud machine, or on an existing system.

You can choose from the most popular host systems as well. Puppet is also documented in an in-depth manner. Since the matters require better understanding, you should be prepared to invest your time studying much of the documentation before you begin your work. Puppet also provides courses and training. If you are looking for commercial support, it might make sense to enroll an online or even in person training course. Similar resources for Chef are available. If you need a proof of proficiency with either tool, both companies offer relevant services towards certification.

All in all, there are lots of articles and forum threads regarding both systems, so finding information should not be a problem. In addition, both Puppet and Chef have thriving communities. They offer the modules directory in the form of PuppetForge and Supermarket. They have similar followings on GitHub and are being actively developed.

Keep in mind that the plans require you to have more than a handful of nodes. The price is negotiable. As previously mentioned, training, courses, and certifications are available as well. Of the two systems, Puppet is the older one. This basically means better stability and support. It might also be easier to find people skilled in it. There are some downsides as well. The declarative language may require some adjustment for people who mostly do coding.

It requires less of a traditional infrastructure, and it scales well. Its main differentiator comes at a price, though. Nice article. Platform Overview. Features Alerts. With everything from the similarities and differences to the pros and cons between the two configuration management tools, this guide is sure to help you decide which server to work with. Chef is a code-driven configuration management tool used to transform infrastructure into code.

Chef clients use this software tool to manage infrastructure and translate tasks into reusable terms. Chef is a cloud-based tool and it uses a Ruby-based domain-specific language DSL. Chef is well-known for being able to automate how infrastructure is deployed, configured, and managed, regardless of size. Puppet is another open-source configuration management tool, deemed to be the industry standard for configuration management.

This software tool is designed to be simple enough for most users to learn, but also complex enough to be able to handle difficult tasks and infrastructure. Using the Puppet Enterprise console, system administrators and IT professionals are able to complete a variety of tasks from managing large infrastructures to scheduling maintenance of the desired states of nodes. Both Chef and Puppet can be amazing configuration management tools, but there are a few distinct differences and similarities between the two.

Taking time to properly analyze and compare the differences and similarities before deciding to use one or the other.

While both Chef and Puppet have good availability, they run in different ways. For Chef, if the main server goes down, there is a backup server in place to take over. Puppet, on the other hand, is a system based on the use of masters. Since there are multiple masters, if the active master goes down for any reason, one of the others simply takes over and fills in for the previously active master. Get matched to a bootcamp today.

The average bootcamp grad spent less than six months in career transition, from starting a bootcamp to finding their first job.

One of the most important differences between Chef and Puppet is the cost. This is an annual fee, so you can calculate your yearly cost by determining how many nodes you will need and multiplying that number by Puppet, on the other hand, is a bit more forgiving when it comes to cost.

Drop Your Query. Get A Coupon Code. Select Classroom Live Virtual online. Get Your Coupon Code. Chef Vs Puppet — A comparative study DevOps is becoming a trending and successful methodology due to many reasons and primarily due to the concurrent happening of development and operations. Top 10 Difference Between Chef and Puppet We would want to start directly with a comparison table to enlighten you with the basic difference between chef and puppet.

What are Chef and Puppet Chef , the configuration management tool makes automation possible across several devices and servers with not many steps to follow. Why Chef Vs Puppet comparisons are required If you are a beginner, you may wonder why this comparative study between chef and puppet. Final thoughts It is needless to say which one to choose as you will already know which the best for your project is as you know the differences between chef and puppet.

Important Links. Call Us. Drop A Query. Drop a Query. Comparatively easy still takes time due to certificate signing between the agent and the master. The annual fee for chef automation is close to USD with which build and deployment can be done.